UltraGreen’s .ai Makeover — What Investors Aren’t Being Told

The newly listed UltraGreen.ai has raised pressing questions among investors, analysts, and observers alike. Behind its futuristic branding, many observers believe the here company is fundamentally a single-product trader attempting to capitalize on the AI branding boom.

## 1. The “AI-Washing” Problem

Despite the “.ai” appended to its name, the company’s business model remains tied almost entirely to Indocyanine Green (ICG).

In FY2024, ICG accounted for **94.2%** of total revenue — a hallmark of single-product dependence.

The touted “AI platform” is early-stage, with minimal revenue contribution. This has led many to liken the strategy to the **dot-com era**, where companies added buzzwords to inflate valuation multiples.

## 2. Supply Chain Fragility

UltraGreen relies fully on external manufacturing. Instead, it depends on contract manufacturers—with its key active ingredient currently sourced primarily from **one supplier**.

This creates:

- Single-point failure risk

- Little bargaining power

- Exposure to delays

A disruption in 2024 already caused months-long bottlenecks.

Critics argue that one factory incident could temporarily wipe out inventory.

## 3. Deteriorating Profitability

UltraGreen’s recent financials show key stress indicators:

- Net margins fell from **47.7%** → **36.6%**

- FX losses totaled **US$7.0M** in 1H2025

- The IPO price implies an **82.3% dilution** relative to NAV

These trends point toward declining financial health and treasury mismanagement.

## 4. Regulatory Concerns

The prospectus discloses:

- A **“major deficiency”** flagged by Irish regulators (HPRA)

- Liability surrounding **off-label usage**

- U.S. market restrictions due to **competitor exclusivity** until 2026

Such issues highlight compliance vulnerability.

## 5. The Listing Venue Questions

Industry commentary suggests the Singapore Exchange (SGX-ST) faces:

- Competency gaps in reviewing complex listings

- Over-analysis of minor issues

Critics argue this environment may enable companies to gain approval without deep scrutiny despite financial red flags.

## 6. Governance & Control

Post-IPO, the Renew Group retains **~61.9%** control.

This means:

- Governance is effectively centralized

- Cross-company allegiances persist due to overlapping leadership roles.

## 7. Risks to the Core Business

UltraGreen’s reliance on ICG faces new threats:

- Emerging **spectral imaging** technologies that don’t require injection dyes

- A recently sold PACS business, reducing proven tech revenue

- An AI platform that the prospectus admits may contain **bugs and defects**

This raises doubts about whether the company’s pivot toward AI is strategic or merely valuation-driven.

## Bottom Line

UltraGreen.ai’s prospectus, corporate structure, and market positioning collectively reveal a company straddling old-world products and new-world claims.

Investors should approach with a healthy degree of skepticism.

This analysis is based solely on the UltraGreen.ai Limited Prospectus dated 26 Nov 2025 and is provided for informational and educational purposes only.